My name is Mauro Bagnato and for over 15 years I have been leading tech organizations.
When I first stepped into leadership, I believed technical expertise was the key to being an effective leader. However, I quickly learned that organizations are living and complex systems and that leading them demands much more than just technical know-how. I believe that curiosity is at the heart of effective leadership. This is what fuels learning and experimentation, both crucial for continuous improvement. This blog aims to explore engineering leadership in all its aspects and to provide insights in a tangible and pragmatic manner. It will also be a space where I will share insights, reflections, and personal takeaways from books, podcasts, and articles that influenced and keep influencing my journey.
Wouldn’t it be great to spot and address all possible pitfalls of a project before it even starts?
While many are familiar with the concept of a post-mortem—analyzing what went wrong after the fact— the pre-mortem technique might not be as widely recognized.
Yet, it is an extremely effective tool for identifying potential pitfalls before they happen.
In essence, a post-mortem is about analyzing a project or initiative after it has failed or succeeded, identifying what went wrong or right, and using those insights to improve.
Conversely, a pre-mortem, like a time machine, takes you to a future where the project has failed (even if it has not even started) and works backward to determine the potential causes.
This method completely shifts the team's perspective, encouraging a forward-thinking mindset that helps identify potential risks, challenges, and pitfalls that might not be evident in the initial planning phases.
I have been using this technique for quite some time now and I find it extremely powerful because:
f you want to give it a try, here follow a structured approach to conduct a pre-mortem session: